docs: use generic instead of OSS controller
This term was really confusing me because all of these controllers in this repo are OSS. So, instead use the term generic and define it upon first use.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c14d0d852b
commit
8c9e88058c
2 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ Unless you're running on a cloudprovider that supports Ingress out of the box
|
|||
|
||||
## Firewall rules
|
||||
|
||||
If you're using a bare-metal controller (eg the nginx ingress controller), you
|
||||
If you're using a generic controller (eg the nginx ingress controller), you
|
||||
will need to create a firewall rule that targets port 80/443 on the specific VMs
|
||||
the nginx controller is running on. On cloudproviders, the respective backend
|
||||
will auto-create firewall rules for your Ingress.
|
||||
|
||||
If you'd like to auto-create firewall rules for an OSS Ingress controller,
|
||||
If you'd like to auto-create firewall rules for an Ingress controller,
|
||||
you can put it behind a Service of `Type=Loadbalancer` as shown in
|
||||
[this example](/examples/static-ip/nginx#acquiring-an-ip).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue